Slave!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6KOD5iicdU&feature=player_embedded
========================================
Camp FEMA: American Lockdown - FULL MOVIE - 86 min
=============================
More than 1,300 people have been sheltered at Red Cross camps in the US East Coast because of hurricane Irene, US authorities say.
Officials said on Saturday that the powerful storm would reach the towns along the New Jersey shore within hours, CNN reported.
Thousands of residents fled the coastal towns, including popular spots such as Atlantic City, Cape May and Long Beach Island.
Irene also knocked out power to some 500,000 customers across the eastern part of the country, according to officials.
Earlier on Saturday, the hurricane battered the coast of North Carolina near Jacksonville with winds of more than 85 mph (140km/h), the National Hurricane Center in Miami said.
Irene is approaching Washington, New York and Boston, a densely-populated corridor home to some 65 million people.
Meanwhile, New York City's mayor Michael Bloomberg urged 370,000 people to leave the city immediately, warning of serious threats of the hurricane.
full original article
=======================
NWO Plans Exposed By Insider In 1969
Is The CIA-Mossad-MI6 Using Hollywood To Prepare Us For A Plague? o please dear god don't let gwyneth die... On March 4, 2001 the pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen TV series aired. The story was of a commercial airline being electronically hijacked to be crashed into the World Trade Center in order to provoke an invasion of Afghanistan. Exactly 6 months and 7 days later that became real though the movie had a happy ending with the heroes breaking the remote control system and gaining control of the airplane. Many of us speculate that is what happened to Flight 93. It had to be shot down because the flight crew had regained control and could not land with such a story to tell. After 911 Alex Jones, an internationally known Internet radio show host, was contacted by someone from The Lone Gunmen production team who was freaked out about their pilot episode having become reality. He said they were given the outline for that particular show by the CIA. The Lone Gunmen series was a spin off of the X-Files series. That series was a hangout for FBI and CIA agents who quite often suggested some of the scripts. I should point out that when someone flashes an FBI badge he might really be a CIA agent. When Terry Kent Reed, the author of Compromised, first met Ollie North, Major North was working for the NSA and showed an FBI badge. On Friday September 9th Hollywood will release the movie Contagion about the CDC and a new Bird flu plague. From what I understand in the movie this plague was not made in a US-Israeli secret military lab. This movie stars Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Winslet and French actress Marion Cotillard. With box office names from the US, England and France you know that this movie was designed to pull in a large volume of people from many different nations. So the question we must ask is this: Was this movie about a plague from hell inspired for a reason by the CIA-Mossad-MI6 Empire of Evil? ======================================== New 9/11 graphic coloring book emerges on brink 10 year anniversary  On the brink of the 10th anniversary of September 11th a new children’s ‘graphic coloring novel’ has emerged. We want to know; is it appropriate for kids? According to the publisher, the book entitled ‘We Shall Never Forget 9/11 – The Kids’ Book of Freedom’ is “designed to be a tool that parents can use to help teach children about the facts surrounding 9/11.” The book opens on September 11, 2011 with a picture of Osama Bin Laden as he plots the US attacks. It ends nearly 10 years later with the raid of Bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound and his death. Several pages show both American military and Muslims with guns. The final page of the story shows a bullet flying toward Bin Laden before his death. Publishers say the book ‘demonstrates honesty, reverence, integrity and good character,’ with ‘a historic and educational perspective.’ 7 Action News showed the coloring book to the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic relations. He calls the book disgusting because it portrays all Muslims as radicals when indeed American Muslims had nothing to do with 9-11 and they were victims as well as first responders that day. “This publisher is doing a disservice to innocent young minds by showing this type of nonsense. In every single reference to Muslims has to do with radical, extremists, and depictions of people being terrorists,” said Dawud Walid. Spokesperson for the publisher, Wayne Bell, released a statement to Action News about the use of Osama Bin Laden and said: “Because they see the man, Osama Bin Laden, get shot in black and white, that provides closure for them.” Parents, we want to know what you think. Is this coloring book appropriate for children? Let us know in the comment section. R.I.P. charles  Counter terrorism officer sues Met over De Menezes 'cover-up'
A Christian counter-terrorism officer involved in the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes is suing the Metropolitan Police over allegations that senior officers tried to cover-up vital evidence. He says his faith compelled him to blow the whistle and he is now claiming thousands of pounds for loss of overtime pay and promotions after Special Branch bosses allegedly sidelined him. One allegation involves anti-terror officers perverting justice by replacing a chief inspector with another to give more favourable evidence at the 2008 inquest into de Menezes’s death. An inquest jury returned an open verdict into the shooting of the 27-year-old Brazilian who was mistaken for a suicide bomber in 2005 – rejecting the police view that he was killed lawfully. The detective sergeant, who cannot be named for legal reasons, first made his concerns known after he gave evidence under a codename at the inquest. Two more serious concerns were reported about issues within the Met Police’s counter-terrorism department, known as SO15, last December that form the main part of his tribunal case. He is also suing for religious discrimination and loss of earnings. A senior source said: ‘The allegations are about such a sensitive subject that top brass are very worried about what could come out in a tribunal.’
full article============================================================ The Inexplicable War on Lemonade Stands I’m beginning to think that there’s a nation-wide government conspiracy against either lemonade or children, because these lemonade stand shutdowns seem to be getting more and more common. If you set up a stand for your kids, just be prepared for a visit from the cops. In Coralville, Iowa police shut down 4-year-old Abigail Krstinger’s lemonade stand after it had been up for half an hour. Dustin Krustinger told reporters that his daughter was selling lemonade at 25 cents a cup during the Register’s Annual Great Bicycle Race Across Iowa (or RAGBRAI), and couldn’t have made more than five dollars, adding “If the line is drawn to the point where a four-year-old eight blocks away can’t sell a couple glasses of lemonade for 25 cents, than I think the line has been drawn at the wrong spot.” |
==========================================================
California to make it a felony for MDs to treat cancer without chemo, radiation or surgery
There are more than enough cancer patients in need of treatment, but there aren't anywhere near enough treatments that get the job done! Medical doctors and CAM practitioners should be working together to pool resources and bring as many options for treatment as possible to the table as consideration for treatment. It is the moral and scientific responsibility of every health care practitioner who treats cancer to have, or have access to, broad knowledge of all treatments that treat cancer before rushing to any specific treatment, especially if the treatment has potentially serious side effects. This is just simple commonsense. So why, then, doesn't this happen in the real world? Why do patients feel forced to create their own cancer treatment programs that merges mainstream and CAM treatments and then withhold this information from their practitioners?
Can we let arrogance take precedence over wisdom when choosing a patient's treatment program, especially when life is at stake? Is it necessary to only accept peer reviewed literature from major medical journals when it comes to recommending treatment. On the other hand, is there any possible value to using time tested treatments that have not been studied from the perspective of western medical research?
Should treatment options be limited by the particular health care discipline the practitioner is trained, whether mainstream or CAM? We must demand that our practitioner state things accurately. If there is no further realistic treatment in the opinion of the treating practitioner, it should be stated that the practitioner is unaware of further treatment benefits, but it might still be a good idea to continue searching for additional treatments. All too commonly, oncologists make the arrogant assumption that because there are no additional medical treatments that there is nothing more that should be sought after. How would they know when they are not trained in CAM therapies? It is presumptive and inhuman for any health care practitioner to tell a patient to go home and get his or her affairs in order because no further treatment is possible and death is on the horizon?
Can we let arrogance take precedence over wisdom when choosing a patient's treatment program, especially when life is at stake? Is it necessary to only accept peer reviewed literature from major medical journals when it comes to recommending treatment. On the other hand, is there any possible value to using time tested treatments that have not been studied from the perspective of western medical research?
Should treatment options be limited by the particular health care discipline the practitioner is trained, whether mainstream or CAM? We must demand that our practitioner state things accurately. If there is no further realistic treatment in the opinion of the treating practitioner, it should be stated that the practitioner is unaware of further treatment benefits, but it might still be a good idea to continue searching for additional treatments. All too commonly, oncologists make the arrogant assumption that because there are no additional medical treatments that there is nothing more that should be sought after. How would they know when they are not trained in CAM therapies? It is presumptive and inhuman for any health care practitioner to tell a patient to go home and get his or her affairs in order because no further treatment is possible and death is on the horizon?
There is a huge ongoing turf war between mainstream and CAM practitioners when it comes to treating cancer. What is keeping these well-meaning health care practitioners from coming together and synergizing new treatment strategies? Is it about money or just simple arrogance? Mainstream doctors are taught that research is the basis for using certain drugs and that without it there is no science and therefore no basis for additional treatment approaches.
However, there are two flaws in this thinking. First, what is published in mainstream medical journals is hardly good science. This has been studied numerous times and is it now firmly established that most of the studies published that are funded by Big Pharma are seriously flawed because of conflicts of interest. Secondly, just because there are no studies on a treatment does not mean it doesn't work. It simply means that we have no studies showing that it either works or does not work. If the treatment being considered is non-toxic, cheap, available, and possibly helpful to treat cancer, why not consider using it, especially as a last resort? The minimum possible benefit will be the placebo effect.
However, there are two flaws in this thinking. First, what is published in mainstream medical journals is hardly good science. This has been studied numerous times and is it now firmly established that most of the studies published that are funded by Big Pharma are seriously flawed because of conflicts of interest. Secondly, just because there are no studies on a treatment does not mean it doesn't work. It simply means that we have no studies showing that it either works or does not work. If the treatment being considered is non-toxic, cheap, available, and possibly helpful to treat cancer, why not consider using it, especially as a last resort? The minimum possible benefit will be the placebo effect.
====================================================
Market crash 'could hit within weeks', warn bankers
A more severe crash than the one triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers could be on the way, according to alarm signals in the credit markets.
Insurance on the debt of several major European banks has now hit historic levels, higher even than those recorded during financial crisis caused by the US financial group's implosion nearly three years ago.
Credit default swaps on the bonds of Royal Bank of Scotland, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo, among others, flashed warning signals on Wednesday. Credit default swaps (CDS) on RBS were trading at 343.54 basis points, meaning the annual cost to insure £10m of the state-backed lender's bonds against default is now £343,540.
The cost of insuring RBS bonds is now higher than before the taxpayer was forced to step in and rescue the bank in October 2008, and shows the recent dramatic downturn in sentiment among credit investors towards banks.
"The problem is a shortage of liquidity – that is what is causing the problems with the banks. It feels exactly as it felt in 2008," said one senior London-based bank executive.
"I think we are heading for a market shock in September or October that will match anything we have ever seen before," said a senior credit banker at a major European bank.
============================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment