The Science Of Epigenetics - How Our Minds Can Reprogram Our Genes
Guest Writer for Wake Up World
How much control do we have over our own lives? Are we really controlled by our genes, trapped in our own selfishness, like some modern authors want us to believe? Just how much power do we have to shape our lives and those of others?
Contrary to what many people are being led to believe, a lot of the emphasis placed on genes determining human behaviour is nothing but theory and doctrine. The "selfish gene" model is an assumption, it is not a scientific fact.
What Is The Central Dogma?
The central dogma is the doctrine that information in our cells flows only in one direction - from DNA to RNA to proteins. Simply put, it is a dogmatic belief in absolute determinism.
Let's take a quick look at its history. Back in 1990, a huge, international research program began - the human genome project. Its stated goals were to map out all human genes and their interactions using computer software and then to convert that knowledge into (profitable) "benefits" for mankind, such as finding cures for the most horrible diseases.
They sure made it sound good and they spent a lot of taxpayers' money on it, but was the whole project used for good? Personally, I don't think so.
In essence, what the central dogma says is that since it is proteins that carry out the essential life-processes inside our cells, and their functions can only do what our genes say (this is what the medical establishment and certain fanatical branches of evolution theory want us to believe), then we humans are nothing more than the calculated, deterministic expression of our genes. We're little robots whose biology, emotions, health and beliefs are not of our choosing. We're humatons!
This is the theory that is being taught in medical schools and universities all over the world today. Fortunately for all conscious people, this disempowering belief has been proven to be false.
Is Evolution Deterministic?
Fifty years before the publication of Darwin's The Origin Of Species, frenchman Jean Baptiste Lamarque postulated that living beings must have an innate perception of their environment in order to evolve, and that they evolve in response to changes in their surroundings. His idea was that genetic mutations are definitely not random. There is an inherent intelligence at play in life that we can't even begin to understand.
The response of the "scientific community" at the time was not favourable. They ridiculed Lamarque's theory and eliminated him from the history books, giving Darwin the sole credit for discovering evolution, even though, in reality, Darwin published his book fifty years after Lamarque and his book based a lot of its theory on the work of yet another man, Alfred Russel Wallace, many of whose ideas Darwin copied.
According to Lamarque, there is an interplay of forces between living beings and their environments. According to the Darwinian model, evolution is strictly deterministic and is based on random mutations.
So, who got closer to the truth? Luckily for us, Lamarque was right about at least one thing: cells have consciousness. read on....